The University of California, San Diego (UCSD) has mandated that all incoming undergraduate students, starting in Fall 2024, must take at least one course focused on climate change. This new initiative, labeled the Jane Teranes Climate Change Education Requirement, has been hailed by some as an essential step toward educating the next generation about global climate challenges. However, critics argue that this mandate is just another example of academia's growing trend toward ideological conformity, using climate change as a vehicle to push progressive social agendas.
UCSD officials claim the program will empower students from all disciplines to engage meaningfully with climate change solutions. Chancellor Pradeep Khosla praised the new requirement, stating that it will equip students across STEM, social sciences, and humanities with the skills needed to address the climate crisis. More than 40 approved courses—including offerings like "Climate Justice" and "Gender and Climate Justice"—are designed to meet this requirement. Yet, detractors question whether these courses emphasize practical climate science or veer too far into political territory. Skeptics see this as part of a larger trend within higher education to integrate environmentalism with social justice, potentially at the expense of objective scientific learning.
Indoctrination Or Education? UC San Diego Launches Climate Change Course Requirement via @ccdeditor https://t.co/ndNnmzw9zP
— Climate Dispatch (@ccdeditor) October 7, 2024
The requirement is modeled after UCSD’s Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) Requirement, which some critics have also labeled as more about indoctrination than education. The climate program shares a similar interdisciplinary approach, and students can satisfy the mandate by taking courses that tackle climate change through various lenses—scientific, political, or cultural. While the university touts this as necessary to provide a well-rounded understanding of climate issues, opponents argue that it reflects the growing politicization of environmental topics within academia.
Some faculty members and outside commentators express concerns that such mandatory courses could stifle intellectual diversity. They argue that while climate change is a pressing issue, requiring students to take classes with specific ideological frameworks—especially those combining climate science with social justice topics like "Indigenous Approaches to Climate Change"—could lead to one-sided perspectives. The mixing of science with progressive policy agendas has led some to accuse universities of pushing students toward activism rather than fostering critical thinking.
🚨🚨🚨 CHEMTRAILS CAUSE FLOODING IN SAN DIEGO EXPOSED
A highlight from yesterday's San Diego County Board of Supervisors meeting.
I was screaming about the chemtrails last week in the week before apparently there was a legitimate cloud seeding project going on in our area. Told… pic.twitter.com/U5tFUK8Nut— Matt Baker (@slave_2_liberty) February 7, 2024
San Diego itself is aggressively pursuing environmental goals. The city’s Climate Action Plan aims for net-zero emissions by 2035, with ambitious measures targeting everything from transportation to energy consumption.
While these goals may seem laudable, skeptics point out the potential economic impact of such policies on businesses and residents. Additionally, some argue that focusing heavily on emissions reductions and renewable energy may ignore more immediate and pressing urban challenges, such as homelessness and infrastructure decay.
The mandatory climate change courses at UCSD are just the latest in a series of educational reforms aimed at addressing what progressives view as the climate emergency. Under President Biden’s American Climate Corps, similar programs are being expanded across the country, aimed at training young people in climate-related fields. However, some question whether these initiatives are truly preparing students for practical careers or simply steering them into activist roles.
Ultimately, UCSD’s climate course requirement reflects a broader ideological shift in academia, one that has sparked concern over how higher education is increasingly intermingling science with progressive political goals. While the university claims these courses will prepare students for a changing world, skeptics worry that they may be forced to adopt a particular worldview rather than be encouraged to explore a full range of perspectives on the complex issue of climate change.
there is no evidence of man made climate change. it is all b/s put forward by the globalists to gain control of freedom and thought.